To see a large contingent of NBA owners, players, lawyers, businessmen, economists and others with more conservative costumes on stage the night of the project in Newark, New Jersey, many of the basketball hit the biggest event this side of the NBA Finals. Commissioner David Stern has come to use for this crucial round of negotiations on the language, saying it is concluded from the close of business on Tuesday on the hand when the dynamism and commitment reaches a new collective agreement before the current contract expires in 10 days.
The clock is ticking and the track is closed, Stern said last week, after negotiations, committees from both sides met for 4? Hours and left with an agreement on something other than the need to take a turn more to overcome the significant differences between the two parties. The players made a small step, on Friday cut the income of the player after the owner of the three-year delay of 45 million hard-cover system with a maximum length of the contract for four years and about $ 700 million in pay cuts get. The owner responded with what they see as an important concession - to have guaranteed his insistence on the elimination of any contract in its entirety. As players were skeptical of what was the significance of this offer, the waiting time to see: Sources indicate that hope the players to submit a new formal proposal Tuesday, and the owners, enough of a change in the position to justify representing the continuation of negotiations .
Sources indicate that the proposal is the youngest player to accept an offer less than 50 percent additional income beyond a certain point in the new CBA. For example, the income by nearly $ 3800000000 is expected if the books in the 2010-11 season, have been completed when the player hits, in essence, their current 57 percent of the BIS (basketball related income) to the limit of time to hold that the owners of more than 50 percent of income beyond. The owners still have their insistence on excluding approximately $ 900 million in revenue sharing, the players and a 50-50 split, after the owners to overcome the pocket the difference. To call a proposal 50-50 is less than half the truth.
But what the players have a Tuesday, go beyond tinkering at the margins. Whether this is sufficient depends on the dynamics of the negotiations, but also the resilience of a system that has been committed to the fans of basketball in the last 18 months. The idea here is that to the debate between the owners, the drastic changes to make to make, 30 billionaires, the possibility of making a profit, and the players and try to wages, benefits and work rules, the collective past quarter century have contracts as wrong as it is intellectually dishonest.
The real difference is in fact between two factions of the ownership of the NBA. It is both those who are against the poor, but that's part of it. The distinction is important in these negotiations is one of the owners who have been there and those who simply act as if.
Sources of knowledge about the negotiations confirmed CBSSports.com, which should be obvious to every call attention to the owner for golfers that the delivered product is growing rapidly in popularity, have the commitment of the fans and other indicators that can be developed to try, for the general health of a sport: At this point in the negotiations, it was not the owner against the players, but the owners against the owners.
The old guard of the property of the faithful are used to neck and neck with star during the interviews of the employees are almost entirely disappeared, and star not to rely on the likes of Abe Pollin, William Davidson, Larry Miller and others to work to hold further peace for the proverbial goose with the golden eggs. Superior because of the need in number, has become star of the negotiations to a younger generation demanding owner to change the loss of life in his heart craft have suffered was due to an increase of the value of franchise slower than ever before, and now try what they be seen as an inalienable right back on the backs of the players.
These newcomers have a system that worked for them until the global financial crisis struck in 2008, re-evaluate, so that the possession of an NBA team, a hobby or a business to have to make money. Together they led the league's hard line position on the reduction of wages, restrictions on the movement of players and a fundamental change to reach the players money and power to the owners under an employment contract for 10 years at least a 33 percent reduction in player salaries for a period of three years.
So while it may be useful for the players to more extensive with that than the addition of other mid-level exception and delivery of draft picks of successful teams, the idea that exposure to the players is that the impasse in negotiations end is a farce. The responsibility should be on star to his two factions of owners, including the very different priorities and perspectives to join not have a reasonable standard.
However, if the ball intelligently star players Friday, said: We hope we get a proposal for the economy, which was drawn by some veterans of labor disputes as a last gesture of NBA Commissioner considered. Owner of criminals drastic negotiations if the players do not move very large Tuesday, sources say, the league will begin almost certainly in full swing in a straight line the way to a lock-out - and perhaps after a guard in the ownership of the driving force behind the strategy of the league.
The best hope for a deal - this week, next week, next month or in September - Labor Relations Committee chairman Peter Holt (Spurs), President of Board Glen Taylor (Timberwolves) - is from what are described as moderate on the asset side Mickey Arison (Heat) Jeanie Buss (Lakers) and James Dolan (Knicks). All are members of the working relationship and are faithful star or the protection of a system that works for them. They sit on opposite sides of the big-market/small-market Division, but also fear of the devastation that could result from a prolonged work stoppage.
At this time the debate will move to find a realistic middle ground that inspired the players to give up something important, and the problem should be solved more pleasure from the beginning have to: the sharing of revenues. If teams like the Knicks, Lakers exceed, Bulls and networks (whose revenue picture improves dramatically with a movement from Brooklyn) part of the income generating activities for local television in some cases, the net counterparts Small market? They are reluctant, but it would be better to lose hundreds of millions of revenue during the lockout. If the owners lament the missed opportunity to make a free fight, Sacramento, profitability, just let the Maloof Anaheim? They are low-income teams never had confidence in the equipment of high income levels the playing field - no matter how many players are paid?
But the responsibility is on Tuesday 7 Game of the NBA collective bargaining? To say that the player is only partially correct. Yes, it would be good to hear new ideas from them and know the silence of the Union Strange Managing Director, Billy Hunter, instead of mid-level players are trying to protect the wage level of the star to the less-than-star-level again. But at this point, after 18 months is a bold strategy is not everywhere, but in a circle, would be more productive to listen to new ideas and a realistic vision of the owners, too.
New ideas and a new strategy by the owners who are willing to give priority to the welfare of the cartel who have volunteered to give out its own longer be bought 1/30th of the cake. If you do not get significant movement on both sides is Tuesday, the NBA season from court to court - which is perfect on the right index fingers on two and justify a point on each side.
没有评论:
发表评论