2011年5月15日星期日

New star-based NBA is bad for teams, companies

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport

Hat covers the Orlando Magic, which had probably originated interviews earlier than expected, unexpectedly Atlanta Hawks in the first round of the playoffs in the Eastern Conference defeated.
Thank you to the start, the biggest sports story of Orlando at the moment, frankly, because it is the sport of Orlando, Dwight Howard to stay, whether in Blues Magic.
Amid all the speculation is the belief that the magic you need to sign another star to complement Dwight. Like Magic Dwight and can compete with the elite teams in the league, particularly its southern neighbors in Miami, where Howard is the superstar on the list?
This is a period of reflection of the latest trend in the league. As always, a league of stars and the players were driven around it, it seems that the big market teams are not satisfied, or are considered competitors, unless the lists to be a fantastic project seem straight. The problem is, and I do not know if it got up NBA commissioner David Stern a lot, but it is a bad deal for all. In a league that is, as above, Stern mentioned how a thing may be that all the stars by the Agency to play together conspire? Sounds like a wet dream of a fan if you think the consequences.
It is strong enough to really compete in the NBA. Fans love it when a team like Memphis is a hit and has its own, but the reality is that there are only so many teams, the real contenders. How big this number is reduced if the only way to compete have is literally an all-star team as the starting line?
The NBA needs of smaller markets to keep their stars. If this trend continues, severe high, maybe four teams of three stars each, the incitement to a small fan on the market to buy season tickets, are to see a team of actors?
Has anyone seen the Miami Heat and the New York Knicks this season? When something is proven that the addition of big stars do not necessarily make an unbeatable team, or a better product. Of course, the heat in the Eastern Conference finals, but Chris Bosh is changing the category of superstar status.
There were very few occasions when the heat seemed to him that people thought he regards as a team with all-star tours with the big three to put all the big numbers. But most nights, it just seems to be on half the team a two-star with actors who have famous names.
This brings me to the stars, perhaps more important, but do not make a better product.
A superstar of each team in a competition like a better product. A series of two clear categories, plays a second-class Star Batman Robin the star, makes a better product (except to protect Russell Westbrook, Thunder, think for some reason, he is the star that is both entertaining and shocking what) . the two players form a cohesive effective team is a good product.
After several  alpha male ,  have the ball, the kind of player in a list is to force the players that they too have the ball on the ground.
Take Amare Stoudemire, who was in the process of resurrection basketball in New York and the face of the franchise. Carmelo Anthony had arrived, he made his thunder and fire, if the truth of resources.
CEOs have been lazy. Teams with stars do not build more of them, they need consistent lists of chemicals and match-ups. Dwight Howard Magic GM Otis Smith has a team to build around it, preferably with a step of first point guard can get the best center of the ball game.
The reality is, if it is off to a seventh game, a superstar just going to have the ball in his hands.
How can we be sure that learn two or three other stars of boxing in a specific list?

没有评论:

发表评论